[sdw2003] [Full-disclosure] For sale - Microsoft Internet Explorer 0day

[Levin J. Hitch]

I disagree. Users of this group do like to know about potential issues and the resolution. Posting a 0 day vulnerability for sale and stating that you are glad to not have public facing Windows machines is counter-productive to any list. Posting the knowledge of a vulnerability, how it might be exploited and possible resolutions would be considerably more useful.

Since this conversation is not going to resolve anything and is of no use, I decline to comment on it further. 

________________________________________
From: sdw2003-bounces at mattware.com [sdw2003-bounces at mattware.com] On Behalf Of BMF [badmotherfsckr at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 12:01 PM
To: San Diego Windows 2003 User Group
Subject: Re: [sdw2003] [Full-disclosure] For sale - Microsoft Internet  Explorer 0day

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Levin J. Hitch <lhitch at ymnet.net> wrote:
> Interesting. Your original post does not say any of that. It appears to be more of a bash against using Microsoft Windows products.

In one of the other WUG lists I frequent someone else had just posted
the exact same thing (which I forwarded here) and the list members
themselves were able to infer the correct sorts of actions to be taken
(which I responded with in my followup here, those weren't my ideas).
But this list meets any talk of Windows vulnerabilities with acrimony.
The difference in cultures between WUGs is quite interesting.

BMF
_______________________________________________
sdw2003 mailing list
sdw2003 at mattware.com
http://lists.mattware.com/mailman/listinfo/sdw2003